Eschatological Anthropology of Russian Spiritualists of the Late 19th – Early 20th Century
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2020-4-40-57
Abstract
The article analyzes the correlation between eschatological and anthropological perspectives of Russian spiritualists on the example of their views on corporeity. According to spiritualists, the core eschatological event should come with the transfiguration of the human nature that was supposed to manifest itself through a complete replacement of ‘material’ body by the ‘subtle’ one. They regarded such development as an element of teleological evolutionary process that was attributed an eschatological significance. Spiritualists had dual attitude towards the body: on the one hand, the category of the ‘material’ had explicitly negative connotations in the spiritualistic discourse, but, on the other hand, ‘subtle’ bodies were not absolutely immaterial. The human body served as a scheme by which the cosmos was modelled, and this made itself evident in the use of organic metaphors by spiritualists. The outcome of the eschatological process was seen in the reunification of a cosmic organism. The human was pictured as able to transform itself by its own effort and thus to predetermine the outcome of the eschatological process, which was understood as an anthropocosmic process.
About the Author
A. A. MaklakovaRussian Federation
Anastasia A. Maklakova, master of religious studies
bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125993
References
1. Gacheva, A.G. (2018), Apokatastasis in Russian apocatastasis in Russian religious and philosophical thought of 1870–1930s. The second article. From the beginning of 20th century to Russian emigration of the first wave, RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies, no. 2, pp. 146–159.
2. Harding, S. (2016), Paul’s eschatological anthropology: The dynamics of human transformation. Fortress.
3. Lup, J.R. (2013), Eschatology in a secular age. An examination of the use of eschatology in the philosophies of Heidegger, Berdyaev and Blumenberg, Ph.D. Thesis, University of South Florida.
4. Masloboeva, O.D. (2007), Rossijskij Organizism i kosmism XIX–XX vv: evoluzia I aktualnost [Russian organicism and cosmism of the 19th – 20th centuries. Evolution and relevance], APK i PPRO, Moscow, Russia.
5. Normandin, S., Wolfe T. Ch. (eds.) (2013), Vitalism and the Scientific Image in PostEnlightenment Life Science, 1800–2010. Springer Netherlands.
6. Wisseman, V. (2006), “Johannes Reinke (1839–1931) and his ‘Dominanten’ theorу – an early concept of gene regulation and morphogenesis”, Theory in Biosciences, vol. 124, no. 3–4, pp. 397–400.
7. Wolffram, H. (2003), “Supernormal biology. Vitalism, parapsychology and the German crisis of Modernity, c. 1890–1933”, The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 149–163.
Review
For citations:
Maklakova A.A. Eschatological Anthropology of Russian Spiritualists of the Late 19th – Early 20th Century. Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion. 2020;(4):40-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2020-4-40-57