Directions of Samaritan religious and philosophical thought in the 11th – 18th centuries
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2026-1-30-48
Abstract
The article considers an overview of the main directions of religious and philosophical thought of the Samaritans, which took shape under the influence of Arab philosophy in the 11th – 18th centuries. Analyzing the handwritten monuments of the Samaritans (in particular, ʾAbū al-Ḥasan al-Ṣūrī, Munaǧǧā ibn Ṣadaqah, Ṣadaqah al-Ḥakīm, Ibrāhīm al-Qabāṣī, al-Ġazzāl al-Ġazzī and Ibrāhīm al-ʿAyyah), the author comes concludes that Samaritan thought is constructed by four dependent theological schools – Samaritan Kalam, Peripatetism, Sufism and Ishraqism. Within the framework of the general doctrine, implying the belief in Mount Gerizim Temple exclusivity, the sanctity of Samaritan Pentateuch, general eschatological teachings and the doctrine of the divine attributes, al-Ṣūrī and al-ʻAyyah developed their own version of the Mu’tazili and Maturidi kalam, Munaǧǧā and Ṣadaqah – the Peripatetic-Ismaili doctrine of Anima Mundi, al-Qabāṣī – the Sufi concept of spiritual hierarchy, and al-Ġazzī – the theory of the photic nature of movement, proposed by illuminationists. The study is preceded by an introduction covering the history of the theology of the Samaritans in the 4th – 11th centuries, as well as its connection with Jewish discourse.
About the Author
F. O. NofalRussian Federation
Faris O. Nofal, Cand. of Sci. (Philosophy)
12/1, Goncharnaya St., Moscow, 109240
References
1. Broadie, A. (1981), A study of the Hellenistic cultural ethos of the Memar Marqah, Brill, Leiden, Netherlands.
2. Crown, A.D. (2001), Samaritan scribes and manuscripts, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany.
3. Macdonald, J. (1964), The theology of the Samaritans, SCM Press, London, UK.
4. Nasyrov, I.R. (2024), “The problem of the divine attributes in theological and philosophical thought of Islam”, Trudy kafedry bogosloviya SanktPeterburgskoi Dukhovnoi Akademii Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 36–56.
5. Nofal, F.O. (2021), “The Samaritan Hexameron’ as an Arab-Muslim anthropological manifesto: reading of the first chapters of Sadaqah al-Haklm’s commentary on Genesis, Islam v sovremennom mire, vol. 17, no 3, pp. 179–194.
6. Nofal, F.O. (2023), “The evolution of Samaritan eschatological exegesis in the 11th – 19th centuries, Bibliya i khristianskaya drevnost’, vol. 19, no 3, pp. 107–125.
7. Nofal, F.O. (2024), “ ‘The Samaritan illuminationism’: the reception of Ishraqi’ philosophy in Samaritan theology of the 18th century”, Filosofskii zhurnal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 35–49.
8. Tigchelaar, E.J.C. (1996), Prophets of Old and the Day of the End: Zechariah, the Book of Watchers and Apocalyptic, Brill, Leiden, Netherlands.
9. Weigelt, F. (2013), Die exegetische Literatur der Samaritaner,in Voigt, R., ed., Durch Dein Wort Ward Jegliches Ding! / Through Thy Word All Things Were Made! 2. Mandaistische Und Samaritanistische Tagung, Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden, Germany, SS. 343–390.
10. Weigelt, F. (2017), Samaritan Bible Exegesis and its significance for Judeo-Arabic studies, Senses of Scripture, treasures of tradition. The Bible in Arabic among Jews, Christians and Muslims, Brill, Leiden, Netherlands, pp. 198–239.
11. Zewi T. (2015), The Samaritan version of Saadya Gaon’s translation of the Pentateuch: Critical edition and study of MS London BL OR 7562 and Related MSS, Brill, Leiden, Netherlands.
Review
For citations:
Nofal F.O. Directions of Samaritan religious and philosophical thought in the 11th – 18th centuries. Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion. 2026;(1):30-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2026-1-30-48
JATS XML


















