Preview

Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion

Advanced search

Why are religious studies and theology not interchangeable disciplines?

https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2024-3-110-129

Abstract

The article poses a seemingly strange problem: is it possible to conceive of the interchangeability of religious studies and theology? It is demonstrated, however, that modern discussions within each discipline tend to displace and marginalize the other. The author believes that the interdisciplinary war between religious studies and theology, which began in the 1990s within the framework of the discussion on the recognition of the latter as an educational and scientific discipline at the state level, is not over at present. It is shown that the argumentation of the parties is built in such a way that leads to the fall of prestige of scientific knowledge about religion in general. To address this problem, the author analyzes and correlates the focus of cognitive interest, subject areas, disciplinary structures, and traditions of both disciplines, and – through correlating the focus of cognitive interest, the community of authors, and the community-audience – their functions for society and the church. The author believes that in the face of the problematic status of scientific humanities knowledge in society and in the church, representatives of both disciplines need to abandon the rhetoric of substitutability and jointly try to present an understandable and academically correct response to the existential, social, and cultural demands associated with religion.

About the Author

K. M. Antonov
Saint Tikhons Orthodox University
Russian Federation

Konstantin M. Antonov, Dr. of Sci (Philosophy), professor

23B, Novokuzneckaya St., Moscow, 115184



References

1. Alfeev, G.V. and Kyrlezhev, A.I. (2021), “Theology in the Church and at the secular university. Features and problems”, Voprosy teologii, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 130–145. Antonov, K.M. (2015), “Ethos of religion and forms of rationality”, Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 95–135.

2. Antonov, K.M. (2020), “Why does the church need religious studies?” Voprosy teologii, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 576–602.

3. Antonov, K.M. (2020), «Kak vozmozhna religiya?»: Filosofiya religii i filosofskie problemy teologii v russkoi mysli XIX–XX vv. [“How is religion possible?” Philosophy of religion and philosophical problems of theology in Russian thought of the 19th – 20th centuries], PSTGU, Moscow, Russia.

4. Ershova, I.I. (2020), “Theology or «theology 2.0»?”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya, no 1, pp. 93–108.

5. Lagunov, A.A. (2021), “Apologetic and educational tasks of Orthodox theology in regards to F.M. Dostoevsky’s spiritual insights (on the occasion of the 200th anniversary of the writer’s birth)”, Voprosy teologii, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 507–516.

6. Shmonin, D. V. (2023), “Theology in a new paradigm”, Voprosy teologii, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 494–508.

7. Zabaev, I.V. (2012), “An empirical approach to practical theology”, Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Bogoslovie. Filosofiia, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 33–46.

8. Zolotukhin, V.V. (2022), “How is it possible to increase knowledge in theology?”, Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, iss. 104, pp. 9–28.


Review

For citations:


Antonov K.M. Why are religious studies and theology not interchangeable disciplines? Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion. 2024;(3):110-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2024-3-110-129

Views: 760


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-4158 (Print)