The Old and New Testaments on the pages of the “Foma” magazine. From mutual legitimization to contrast
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2025-4-156-178
Abstract
The article is devoted to the relationship between the Old and New Testaments is Foma magazine, an Orthodox publication working at the interface of religious and traditional media. The mediatization of religion, which created new space for open discussions on religious issues, led to the actualization of topics that seemed previously studied. However, when being discussed in the mediated space, such issues as, for example, the intertextuality of the Old and New Testaments are presented in a new way. The research is based on an analysis of the material from ten September issues of the Foma magazine. Based on the Essex school of discourse analysis, developed by E. Laclau and Ch. Mouffe, the nodal points of discourse on the Old Testament and the general semantic field in which the Old and New Testaments are mentioned together, working to strengthen given argument, legitimizing the New Testament are revealed. This semantic field touches upon the foundations of Christianity, love, the coming and the prophecies of the Messiah. Equivalence chains are also considered – key topics that are consistently associated with one of the texts and have an oppositional pair for the second text, allowing the authors of articles in the magazine to draw a line between the practices of the Old and New Testaments, contrasting them. In the system of these expanded oppositions, a boundary is drawn between several religious communities, which makes it possible to clarify the religious roots of the perception of the “other”, without tracing the commercialization of this distinction, which is often characteristic of the media space and its struggle for an audience.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. V. KrovitskayaRussian Federation
Anastasia V. Krovitskaya
6-6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
I. S. Dushakova
Russian Federation
Irina S. Dushakova, Cand. of Sci. (Philology)
6-6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Berdyaev, N. (1928), “Markionism”, Put’, no. 12, pp. 116–120.
2. Jørgensen, M. and Phillips, L. (2008), Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod [Discourse analysis as theory and method], Gumanitarnyi tsentr, Khar’kov, Ukraine.
3. Carid, G.B. (1959), “The exegetical method of the Epistle to the Hebrews”, Canadian Journal of Theology, vol. 5, iss. 1, pp. 44–51.
4. Carpentier, N. (2017) The discursive-material knot: Cyprus in conflict and community media participation, Peter Lang, New York, USA.
5. Hepp, A. and Kröner, V. (2010), “Religious media events. The Catholic World Youth Day as an example of the mediatization and individualization of religion”, in Couldry, N., Hepp, A. and Krotz, F., eds., Media Events in a Global Age, Routledge, London, UR, pp. 265-282.
6. Hjarvard, S. (2008), “The mediatization of society. A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change”, Nordicom Review. vol. 29, iss. 2, pp. 105–134.
7. Howarth, D. and Stavrakakis, Ya. (2000), “Introducing discourse theory and political analysis”, in Howarth, D., Norval, A. and Stavrakakis, Ya., eds., Discourse theory and political analysis. Identities, hegemonies and social change, Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, pp. 1–23.
8. Krotz, F. (2009), “Mediatization. A concept with which to grasp media and societal change”, in Lundby, K., ed., Mediatization. Concept, changes, consequences, Peter Lang, New York, USA, pp. 21–40.
9. Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985), Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics, Verso, London, UK, New York, USA.
10. Laclau, E. (2000), “Forewor”, in Howarth, D., Norval, A. and Stavrakakis, Ya., eds., Discourse theory and political analysis. Identities, hegemonies and social change, Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, pp. X–XI.
11. Laclau, E. (2014), “The impossibility of society”, in Angermuller, J., Maingueneau, D. and Wodak, R. eds., The discourse studies Reader. Main currents in theory and analysis, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Philadelphia, USA, pp. 21–24.
12. Saldana, J. (2009), The coding manual for qualitative researchers, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, USA.
13. Torfing, J. (1999), New theories of discourse. Laclau, Mouffe, and Zizek, WileyBlackwell, Oxford, UK.
14. Zienkowski, J. (2017), Articulations of self and politics in activist Discourse. A discourse analysis of citical subjectivities in minority debates, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.
Review
For citations:
Krovitskaya A.V., Dushakova I.S. The Old and New Testaments on the pages of the “Foma” magazine. From mutual legitimization to contrast. Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion. 2025;(4):156-178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2025-4-156-178


















