Tamar’s function in the genealogy of Jesus in the light of Jewish justification hermeneutics
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2025-2-33-48
Abstract
The article presents an analysis of Tamar’s function in the Gospel of Matthew 1:3 in the light of Jewish justification hermeneutics. The author uses an intertextual analysis of precedent phenomena, a comparative method, and a hermeneutic analysis of texts according to the classification of A. Steinsaltz. This research compares the image of Tamar in the following precedent texts: Hebrew Bible, the Book of Jubilees, the Testament of Judas, the works of Philo of Alexandria, rabbinic and patristic literature. The study reveals exculpatory motives in biblical and Jewish literature, such as secrecy and deception for the purpose of salvation, change of nationality, “a marriage made in Heaven”, “a transgression performed for the sake of Heaven”, exceptions that allow the Messianic family to break the law. These results are compared with three main modern interpretations: redemption of sinners, salvation of pagans, scandalous prototypes of Mary. The author claims that Matthew implicitly uses Jewish hermeneutic techniques in his argumentation, such as the hint, gezera shava, binyan av, and kal vahomer. This article is the first part of the study of the four women in the genealogy of Jesus.
About the Author
A. Trupbergenov
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Abay Trupbergenov
7–9, Universitetskaya Emb., Saint Petersburg, 199034
References
1. Beaton, R. (2004), Isaiah’s Christ in Matthew’s, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
2. Brown, R.E. (1993), The birth of the Messiah: A commentary on the infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, Doubleday, New York, USA.
3. Bauckham, R. (2002), Gospel women: Studies of the named women in the Gospels, Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, USA.
4. Davies, W.D. and Allison, D.C. (1988), A critical and exegetical commentary on the Gospel according to Saint Matthew, 3 vols, vol. 1: Introduction and commentary on Matthew I-VII, T. & T. Clark, London, UK.
5. Hood, J.B. (2009), Matthew1:1–17 as a summary of Israel’s story: The Messiah, his brothers, and the nations, D. Sc. Thesis (Philosophy), Highland Theological College UHI and the University of Aberdeen, UK, available at: https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/matthew1117-as-a-summary-of-israels-story (Accessed 25 Apr. 2023).
6. Johnson, M.D. (1969), The purpose of the Biblical genealogies, with special reference to the setting of the genealogies of Jesus, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. Knohl, I. and Maisel, D. (2000), The Messiah before Jesus. The suffering servant of the dead sea scrolls, University of California Press, Oakland, USA.
8. Kristeva, J. (2013), Semiotika: Issledovaniya po semanalizu [Σημειωτική: Recherches pour une semanalyse], Akademicheskii proekt, Moscow, Russia.
9. Luz, U. (2007), Matthew 1-7: A commentary, Fortress Press, Minneapolis, USA.
10. Nazarova, R.Z. and Zolotarev, M.V. (2015), “Precedent phenomena: Problems of definition and classification”, Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 17–23.
11. Nolan, B.M. (1979), The royal Son of God. The Christology of Matthew 1-2 in the setting of the Gospel, Éditions universitaires, Freiburg, Switzerland, Vandenhoeck & Ruprec, Göttingen, Germany.
12. Nowell, I. (2008), “Jesus’ great-grandmothers: Matthew’s four and more”, The Catholic Biblical Quaterly, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1–15.
13. Shmaina-Velikanova, A.I. (2010), “Kniga Ruf’ i problema chuzhezemnyh zhen: istoricheskaja i literaturnaja rekonstrukcija” [The Book of Ruth and the problem of foreign wives: the historical and literary reconstruction], RGGU Bulletin. “Culturology. Art History. Museology” Series, vol. 58, no. 15, pp. 125–138.
14. Steinsaltz, A. (1993), Vvedenie v Talmud [Introduction to the Talmud], Izrail’skii institut talmudicheskikh publikatsii, Institut izucheniya iudaizma v Rossii, Jerusalim, Israel.
15. Stern, D.H. (2004), Kommentarii k evreiskomu Novomu zavetu [Jewish New Testament commentary], Siloam, Moscow, Russia.
16. Tantlevskii, I.R. (1994), Istoriya i ideologiya Kumranskoi obshchiny [The history and ideology of the Qumran community], Tsentr «Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie», Saint Petersburg, Russia.
17. Wainwright, E.M. (1991), Towards a feminist critical reading of the Gospel according to Matthew, De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, New York, USA. (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft)
Review
For citations:
Trupbergenov A. Tamar’s function in the genealogy of Jesus in the light of Jewish justification hermeneutics. Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion. 2025;(2):33-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2025-2-33-48
Views:
74
Email this article 