The Bulgarian Bogomil heresy as a historical myth. Between historiography, religion and esotericism
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2025-1-35-52
Abstract
The article concentrates on the study of the historiographic concept of a dualistic religious tradition, embodied in the form of various heretical movements in Medieval Europe and the Middle East. The study focuses on the history of the Bulgarian Bogomil heresy, which played an important role in this historical concept as a link between the Eastern dualistic sects and the better known Western European Cathars. It is shown how in Bulgarian historiography this concept of continuity, while maintaining its general structure, get rethoughts in various ideological contexts. The analysis of the Bulgarian historians’ discourse is based on methodological positions formulated as a result of modern discussions among researchers of the Cathar heresy. The “Bogomil myth” of Bulgarian historiography is viewed as existing at the intersection of various discursive fields: religious, from which the model of the genealogy of heretical teachings was borrowed; academic, which included various ideological interpretations; esoteric, which is examined using the example of the adaptation of this concept by the Bulgarian theosophical community of the early 20th century – the World White Brotherhood, which used the image of the Bogomils to legitimize its teachings through the construction of a historical myth.
About the Author
S. O. Egorov
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Stanislav O. Egorov, Cand. of Sci. (History)
1, Pirogova St., Novosibirsk, 630090
References
1. Angelov, D. (1961), Bogomilstvoto v B”lgariya [Bogomilism in Bulgaria], Nauka i izkustvo, Sofia, Bulgaria.
2. Brenon, A., (2006), The Cathars, MSM, Barcelona, Spain.
3. Cameron, A. (2003), “How to read heresiology”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 471–492.
4. Egorov, S.O. (2018), “Genealogy of the Bogomils heresy. The problem of reliability of anti-Heretical works’ information]. Nations and Religions of the Eurasia, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 96–103.
5. Goodrick-Clarke, N. (2010), “The coming of the masters. The evolutionary reformulation of spiritual intermediaries in modern theosophy”, in Constructing tradition. Means and myths of transmission in Western esotericism, Brill, Leiden, Netherlands, pp. 113–160.
6. Goodrick-Clarke, N. (2004), The occult roots of Nazism. Secret Aryan cults and their influence on Nazi ideology, Tauris Parke Paperbacks, London, UK.
7. Iricinschi, E. and Zellentin, H.M. (2008), “Making selves and marking others. Identity and Late Antique heresiologies”, in Heresy and identity in Late Antiquity, Mohr Siebeck, Tubingen, Germany, pp. 1–27.
8. Ivanov, I. (1925), Bogomilski knigi i legendi [Bogimils’ books and legends], Pridvorna pechatnica, Sofia, Bulgaria.
9. Obolensky, D. (1948), The Bogomils. A study in Balkan neo-Manichaeism, Cambridge University Press, Cambrdige, UK.
10. Pegg, M.G. (2016), “The paradigm of Catharism, or The historians’ illusion”, in Cathars in question, York Medieval Press, York, UK, pp. 21–52.
11. Pott, S. (2005), “Radical heretics, martyrs, or witnesses of truth? The Albigenses in Ecclesiastical history and literature (1550–1850)”, in Heresy in transition. Transforming ideas of heresy in Medieval and Early Modern Europe, Ashgate, Cornwall, UK, pp. 181–194.
12. Rudbog, T. (2010), “Helena Petrovna Blavatsky’s esoteric tradition”, in Kilcher, A., ed., Constructing tradition. Means and myths of transmission in Western esotericism, Brill, Leiden, Netherlands, pp. 161–177.
13. Runciman, S. (1982), The Medieval Manichee. A study of the Christian dualist heresy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
14. Shapkalova, S. and Naz’’rska, Zh. (2021), Pet’’r D’’nov i Byaloto bratstvo – kulturno nasledstvo i dukhovni prostranstva [Peter Deunov and White Brotherhood – cultural heritage and spiritual space], Za bukvite – O pismenekh’, Sofia, Bulgaria.
15. Stoyanov, Yu. (2000), The other God. Dualist religions from Antiquity to the Cathar heresy, Yale University Press, Yale, USA.
16. Stoyanov, Yu. (2016), “Pseudepigraphic and parabiblical narratives in Medieval Eastern Christian dualism, and their implications for the study of Catharism”, in Cathars in question, York Medieval Press, York, UK, pp. 151–176.
17. von Stuckrad, K. (2010), Locations of knowledge in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Esoteric discourse and Western identities, Brill, Leiden, Netherlands.
18. von Stuckrad, K. (2014), The scientification of religion. An historical study of discursive change, 1800–2000, De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.
19. Vasilev, G. (2008), Heresy and the English reformation. Bogomil-Cathar influence on Wycliffe, Langland, Tyndale and Milton, McFarland & Company, London, UK.
Review
For citations:
Egorov S.O. The Bulgarian Bogomil heresy as a historical myth. Between historiography, religion and esotericism. Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion. 2025;(1):35-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2025-1-35-52
Views:
139
Email this article 