“The one with the white spot on his head”: A favorite animal and its role in the self-awareness of the Hamar
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2024-4-46-59
Abstract
This article explores the phenomenon of “errawak” – the favorite animal in the culture of the Hamar, a pastoral people of southwestern Ethiopia. It examines the process of selecting and ritually transforming the errawak, its role in shaping the shepherd’s identity and social connections within the community. The study analyzes cultural practices associated with errawak, including composing songs and conducting ceremonies. The article shows how key aspects of the Hamar worldview, their aesthetic preferences, and spiritual values are reflected through relationships with errawak. Additionally, the research reveals the ritualistic aspects of errawak care, the symbolic significance of physical modifications made to the animal, and the impact of these practices on Hamar social structure. The paper also explores the linguistic aspects of naming errawak and how these names become an integral part of the owner’s identity. By analyzing the errawak tradition, in contrast to simplified notions of human-animal relationships in traditional cultures, the article raises questions about the complex interaction between human and animal worlds in pastoral societies, extending beyond purely economic relations. The errawak phenomenon is considered in the context of modern anthrozoological studies examining the role of animals in shaping human identity. Parallels are drawn between the attitude towards errawak among the Hamar and the perception of pets in Western culture. The article contributes to understanding the diversity of forms of human-animal interaction across different cultures.
Keywords
About the Author
L. G. Zhukova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Liudmila G. Zhukova, Cand. of Sci. (Cultural Studies), associate professor
6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Abbink, J. (2003), “Love and death of cattle: The paradox in Suri attitudes towards livestock”, Ethnos, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 341-364.
2. Almagor, U. (1972), “Name-oxen and ox-names among the Dassanetch of southwest Ethiopia”, Paideuma, no. 18, pp. 79-96.
3. Ben-Aderet, T., Gallego-Abenza, M., Reby, D. and Mathevon, N. (2017), “Dogdirected speech: why do we use it and do dogs pay attention to it?”, in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 1846, no. 284, pp. 3-10.
4. Bilger, B. (2003), The Last Meow: How far would you go to heal a pet? The New Yorker, September, 8th, pp. 46-53.
5. Bowen, M. (1978), Family therapy in clinical practice, Jason Aronson Inc., Northvale, USA.
6. Cain, A. (1985), “Pets as family members”, Marriage & Family Review, vol. 8, no. 3-4, pp. 5-10.
7. Charls, N. (2014), “ ‘Animals just love you the way you are’: experiencing kinship across the species barrier”, Sociology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 715-730.
8. Fukui, K. (1979), “Cattle colour symbolism and inter-tribal homicide among the Bodi”, in Fukui, K. and Turton, D., eds., Warfare among East African herders, National Museum of Ethnology, Osaka, Japan, pp. 147-177.
9. Hall, S. (1996), “Introduction: who needs identity?”, in Hall, S. and Du Gray, P., eds., Questions of cultural identity, Sage Publications, London, UK.
10. Henry, C.L. and Crowley, S.L. (2015), “The psychological and physiological effects of using a therapy dog in mindfulness training”, Anthrozoös, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 385-401.
11. Kemp, H.R., Jacobs, N. and Stewart, S. (2016), “The lived experience of companionanimal loss: A systematic review of qualitative studies”, Anthrozoös, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 533-557.
12. Knight, J. (2005), “Introduction”, in Knight, J., ed., Animals in person: Cultural perspectives on human-animal intimacies, Berg. Oxford, UK.
13. Kohut, H. (1977), The restoration of the self, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
14. Lydall, J. and Strecker, I. (1979), The Hamar of Southern Ethiopia, vol. 2: Baldambe explains. Renner, Hohenschäftlarn, Germany.
15. Meijl, T., van and Driessen, H. (2003), “Introduction: Multiple identifications and the self”, Focaal: European Journal of Anthropology, no. 42, pp. 17-29.
16. Melson, G.F. and Fine, A.H. (2006), “Animals in the lives of children”, in Fine, A.H., ed., Animal-assisted therapy: Theoretical foundations and guidelines for practice, Academic Press, San Diego, USA, pp. 207-226.
17. Redmalm, D. (2016), “So sorry for the loss of your little friend: Pets’ grievability in condolence cards for humans mourning animals”, in Mourning animals: rituals and practices surrounding animal death, East Lansing, USA, pp. 101-108.
18. Rujoiu, O. and Rujoiu,V. (2014), “Pet loss and human emotion: Romanian students’ reflections on pet loss”, Journal of Loss and Trauma: International Perspectives on Stress & Coping, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 474-483.
19. Serpell, J. and Paul, E. (2002), “Pets and the development of positive attitudes to animals”, in Manning, A.and Serpell, J., eds., Animals and human society, Routledge, London, UK, pp. 165–182.
20. Tannen, D., Kendall, S. and Gordon, C. (2007), “Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse”, in Family talk: Discourse and identity in four American families, New York, USA, pp. 49-70.
21. Tornay, S. (1973), “Langage et perception: La dénomination des couleurs chez les Nyangatom du Sud-Ouest éthiopien”, L’Homme, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 66-94.
22. Turton, D. (1980), “There is no such a beast: Cattle and color naming among the Mursi”, Man, no. 15, pp. 320-338.
23. Walsh, F. (2009), “Human-animal bonds I: The relational significance of companion animals”, Family Process, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 462-480.
Review
For citations:
Zhukova L.G. “The one with the white spot on his head”: A favorite animal and its role in the self-awareness of the Hamar. Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion. 2024;(4):46-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2024-4-46-59
Views:
96
Email this article 