A comparative analysis of Kryashen self-perception in Kryashen public statements of the early 20th century and present days: self-identification and the categorization factor
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2024-3-130-144
Abstract
The article draws a comparison of sources on Kryashen selfidentification from the early twentieth and early twenty-first century. I use R. Jenkins’ theory on self-identification and categorization as inside and outside descriptions of groups to understand the specificity of Kryashen self-perception. While there is a variety of works on the topic of Kryashen identity, the factor of an “external gaze” at their community is less studied. Drawing upon a thematic analysis of texts by Kryashen activist intellectuals D.G. Grigoryev (1906) and N.V. Mamakov (2018), I make it clear that these authors consider Kryashens to be a separate Orthodox Christian people that faces institutional imposition of “Tatar-ness”, so they appeal to the state and the Russian Church in defense of their own identity. They also highlight the role of intelligentsia in consolidation of Kryashen identity and point that Kryashens are not a well-known people in Russia. Existent differences between the texts are generally explained as historical and genre particularities. Expressions of Kryashen social activity on the topic of their identity represent a unique field of research for today’s Russia, a detailed study of which facilitates deepening of theoretical comprehension of self-identification vs. categorization clashes, the role of rejection of expected social roles in identity.
About the Author
G. I. Kornilov
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Gleb I. Kornilov
6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Alekseev, I.E. (2016), “David Grigoryev (Savrushevskiy): Pages of a Priest’s Biography”, in Iskhakov, R.R., ed., Istoriko-kul’turnoe nasledie kryashen VolgoUral’skogo regiona: Aktual’nye voprosy i perspektivy izucheniya: materialy nauchno-prakticheskikh konferentsii, posvyashchennykh 180-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya religioznogo prosvetitelya V.T. Timofeeva [Kryashen historic and cultural heritage in Volga-Ural region. Current questions and study prospects. Proceedings of the academic and pracitical conferences dedicated to 180th anniversary of the Kryashen religious enlightener V.T. Timofeyev’s birthday], Institut istorii imeni Sh. Mardzhani AN RT, Kazan, Russia.
2. Busygina, N.P. (2018), Kachestvennye i kolichestvennye metody issledovanii v psikhologii [Qualitative and quantitative methods of research in psychology], Yurait, Moscow, Russia.
3. Erikson, E.H. (2006), Identichnost’: yunost’ i krizis [Identity: youth and crisis], Flinta, Moscow, Russia.
4. Galindabaeva, V.V. (2019), “Concepts of Kryashen historical memory in Tatarstan. Elitist versions of history and collective memory”, Telescope: journal of sociological and marketing research, no. 5, pp. 10–16.
5. Geraci, R.P. (2013), Okno na Vostok: Imperiya, orientalizm, natsiya i religiya v Rossii [Window on the East. National and imperial identities in late tsarist Russia], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia.
6. Gol’tsov, V.I. (2021), “Official ideology of the autocracy in the 19th – early 20th centuries”, Istoricheskii vestnik, vol. 39, pp. 12–55.
7. Iskhakov, R.R. (2022), “The integration of Kryashens into the Tatar ‘Soviet’ nation”, in Iskhakov, R.R., ed., Stanovlenie i genezis kryashenskoi identichnosti [Development and genesis of Kryashen identity], Institut istorii imtni Sh. Mardzhani AN RT, Kazan, Russia.
8. Jenkins, R. (2008), Social identity, Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames, UK.
9. Kornilov, G.I. (2022), “Group identity of the Molokans of Moscow and the Kryashens of Kazan: experience of comparative analysis (based on feld reasearch)”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. „Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies“ Series, no. 7, pp. 48–62.
10. Mukhammadeeva, L.A. (2017), “Sociopolitical movement of Kryashens in the years 1917–1940”, in Istoriya i kul’tura tatar-kryashen (XVI–XX vv.) [History and culture of Kryashen Tatars (16–20th centuries)], Institut istorii imeni Sh. Mardzhani AN RT, Kazan, Russia.
11. Ovchinnikov, A.V. (2023), “Ethnonational histories. Sociopolitical grounds and the economics of constructionism”, Tempus et Memoria, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 46–60. Sevast’yanov, I.V. (2018), Etnokul’turnaya identichnost’ kryashen v sravnitel’nom kontekste: istoriko-etnograficheskoe issledovanie mol’keevskoi i zakazanskoi etnograficheskikh grupp [Kryashen ethnocultural identity in comparative context. Historical and ethnographic research of the Molkeyevo and the Zakazanye ethnographic groups], Ph.D. Thesis (History), RAS, N.N. Miklukho-
12. Maklai Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Moscow, Russia.
13. Sevast’yanov, I.V. (2022), “ ‘Baptised Tatars’ or Kryashens. Soviet ethnic policy and the self-identification of Turkic-speaking ethnic groups in the Volga-Ural region compared with the Altai-Sayan region”, Herald of Anthropology, no. 4, pp. 26–41.
14. Sokolovskii, S.V. (2002), “ ‘The Tatar problem’ in the all-Russian population census”, Ab Imperio, no. 4, pp. 207–234, available at: https://www.abimperio.net/cgi-bin/aishow.pl?state=showa&idart=35&idlang=2&Code= – S. 207– 234 (Accessed 26 Oct. 2023).
Review
For citations:
Kornilov G.I. A comparative analysis of Kryashen self-perception in Kryashen public statements of the early 20th century and present days: self-identification and the categorization factor. Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion. 2024;(3):130-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2024-3-130-144
Views:
273
Email this article 