Christian subjects and symbolic images of scientific discoveries in a realistic picture: the relationship between science and art
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2023-3-149-159
Abstract
The article deals with the influence of scientific discoveries on the artistic practices of fine arts. We propose a hypothesis about the influence of a new view on the realistic picture by society and artists, as on a visual narrative and narrative practice with a system of semiotic signs and symbols of new realities of natural scientific knowledge of the late Late Middle Ages, the beginning of the New Age in Europe. In this paradigm of scientific discoveries, new proposals for the symbolism of traditional Christian subjects were formed. Was this new symbolic system in the works we are discussing uniquely readable to contemporaries? Probably yes. For those of them who were the customer of easel and monumental paintings, all signs and symbols indicating scientific discoveries were understandable and acceptable in translating into the language of symbols of traditional Christian plots of paintings. We offer a brief overview of the field of poetics of creating a picture from the point of view of realistic exhaustion and reflection.
About the Author
E. G. ShvetsRussian Federation
Elina G. Shvets, Cand. of Sci. (Pedagogics), associate professor
6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Arnkheym, R. (2007), Iskusstvo i vizual’noye vospriyatiye [Art and visual perception], Arkhitektura, Moscow, Russia.
2. Bragina, L.M. (ed.) (2008), Leon Battista Al’berti i kul’tura Vozrozhdeniya [Alberti and Renaissance culture], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
3. Gribbin, J. (2002), M. Richard Feinman: zhizn’ v nauke [M. Richard Feynman: Life in science], Institut komp’yuternykh issledovanii, Izhevsk, Russia.
4. Edgerton, S. (2009), The mirror, the window, and the telescope: How Renaissance linear perspective changed our vision of the Universe, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, USA.
5. Limanskaya, L.Yu. (2008), Opticheskiye miry: estetika zreniya i yazyk iskusstva [Optical worlds: Aesthetics of vision and the language of art], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
6. Panofskii, E. (2004), Perspektiva kak “simvolicheskaya forma” [Perspective as a “symbolic form”], Azbuka-klassika, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
7. Raushenbakh, B.V. (2017), Geometriya kartiny i zritel’noye vospriyatiye [Geometry of the picture and visual perception], Pal’mira, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
8. Shvets, E.G. (2020), “The influence of the study of linear perspective in the visual arts on the scientific discoveries of G. Galileo”, in Akademicheskaya nauka – problemy i dostizheniya: Materialy XXIII mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. [Academic science – problems and achievements. Proceedings of the 23d International Scientific and Practical Conference], Carolina State University Press, Charleston, USA, pp. 14–19.
9. Yakovlev, E.G. (2003), Estetika [Aesthetics], Gardariki, Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Shvets E.G. Christian subjects and symbolic images of scientific discoveries in a realistic picture: the relationship between science and art. Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion. 2023;(3):149-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2023-3-149-159