Preview

Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion

Advanced search

“…One lot for the Lord and the other lot for Azazel”. Reconstruction of the image and cult of Azazel in ancient Judaism

https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2022-4-44-57

Abstract

The article attempts to analyze the evolution of the image and cult of Azazel in ancient Judaism. The research was based on Middle Eastern cuneiform sources, texts of the Tanakh and other Jewish literature, as well as archeological data. The article aims to reveal how and why the image of Azazel was subsequently used in the ritual practice of the Jews. On the basis of a comparative mythological analysis, the author proposes a development scheme of the Azazel image as a deity of the desert, which is a typical deity ofthe Middle Eastern region. This article expresses the assumption that initially Azazel was a separate desert master, but in a length of time he retained only one of the main characteristics of the cult character – the communication function, the function of a «bridge», connecting two spaces – the sacred desert and the cities of Israel. Since the establishment of monotheism, no one else could appear as the owner of the desert, except for the One True God of the Jews. According to this theological logic, Yahweh should have absorbed all the functions, attributes and personalities of Azazel as the god of the desert, but, evidently, in this case, the image of Yahweh would become too cumbersome and uncomfortable, so it turned out easier to keep Azazel in the tradition.

About the Author

A. V. Portnova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Anna V. Portnova

bld. 6, Miusskaja Sq., Moscow, 125047



References

1. Afanasieva, V. (1979), Gil’gamesh i Ehnkidu. Ehpicheskie obrazy v iskusstve [Gilgamesh and Enkidu. Epic images in Art], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.

2. Bill, T. (2014), “Demons in Mesopotamia and Israel. Exploring the category of nondivine but supernatural entities”, in Windows to the Ancient world of the Hebrew Bible. Essays in honor of Samuel Greengus, Pan State University, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 229–246.

3. Casutto, C. (1962), Baal and mot in the Ugaritic texts, Israel Exploration Society, Jerusalem, vol. 12, pp. 77–86.

4. Hunry, O. (1987), Khetty [The hittes]. Nauka The main publishing house of Oriental Literature, Moscow, Russia.

5. Katz, D. (2003), The Image of the Netherworld in the Sumerian Sources. CDL Press, Michigan.

6. Kramer, S. (1961), Sumerian Mythology: A Study of Spiritual and Literary Achievement in the Third Millennium B.C. Harper & Brothers, New-York 1961, 130. pp. 76-83.

7. Nadirov, I. (2009), Esoteric and exoteric aspects of the Semitic klb. St. Petersburg: Institute of Oriental Manuscripts. URL: http://www.orientalstudies.ru/rus/images/pdf/PPV_2009_1-10_10_nadirov.pdf (Accessed 25 Jul. 2022).

8. Patai R. (2005), Iudeiskaya boginya [The Hebrew Goddess], U-Factoria, Ekaterinburg, Russia.

9. Ayaly-Darshan (2020), The Scapegoat ritual and its Ancient Near Eastern parallels. URL: https://www.thetorah.com/article/the-scapegoat-ritual-andits-ancient-near-eastern-parallels (Accessed 25 Jul. 2022).

10. Vavilina, D. (2015), “Babylonian poem about the Plague God Erra. The problem of dating and establishing historical context”, Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Oriental and African Studies, no. 1, pp. 63–72.

11. Wilhelm, G. (1992), Drevnii narod Khurrity [The ancient people of the Hurrians. Essays on history and culture]б Nauka, Moscow, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Portnova A.V. “…One lot for the Lord and the other lot for Azazel”. Reconstruction of the image and cult of Azazel in ancient Judaism. Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion. 2022;(4):44-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2022-4-44-57

Views: 357


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-4158 (Print)