Issue of religious language and realistic phenomenology. Based on Reinach’s Göttingen lectures
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2021-4-32-42
Abstract
The article aims to discover potential of realistic phenomenology for analysis of prayer as the most significant form of religious language.
To that end, the prayer thematization in the framework of religious discourse (as exemplified in works of metropolitan Anthony of Sourozh and R. Schaeffler) is compared to theoretical statements of Reinach’s lecture course “Einleitung in die Philosophie”. The study of texts by metropolitan Anthony and Schaeffler on prayer identifies a basic opposition – between a canonic liturgical text and subjective experience of the one who prays, that opposition manifests itself in reasoning of ordinary discussions on the topic and is overpassed in different ways by the religious thinkers. At another point Reinach’s reflections on some regularities of inner experience, concentrating on the example of artistic forms, offer a new approach to the opposition between formalised ritual and personal experience. While analysing a phenomenon of empathy, Reinach concludes that traditional terms of “the one’s own and the stranger’s” applying to experience must be substituted with an opposition between the immediate and the mediated. From such point of view hymnography is comprehended as a form of symbolic mediation of the ideal contents of religious experience, which allows to speak about the “deprivatization” of religious experience as an original contribution of realistic phenomenology to the philosophy of religion.
About the Author
A. V. KoltsovRussian Federation
Alexander V. Koltsov
bld. 23, Novokuznetskaya St., Moscow, 115184
References
1. Anthony (Bloom), mitr. Surozhsky (2002), “Ya khochu podelit’sya s vami vsem, chto nakopilos’…” [I want to share with you all that I collected…], in Anthony (Bloom), mitr. Surozhsky, Trudy [Works], Book 1, Praktika, Moscow, Russia, pp. 714–830.
2. Barth, K. (2010), Molitva [Prayer], Bibleisko-bogoslovskii institut sv. apostola Andreya, Moscow, Russia.
3. Beckmann, B. (2003), Phänomenologie des religiösen Erlebnisses: religionsphilosophische Überlegungen im Anschluss an Adolf Reinach und Edith Stein, Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg, Germany.
4. Bento, S.S. (2017), “Martin Heidegger e o ‘Absoluto’. A apropriação fenomenológica dos fragmentos sobre filosofia da religião (1916–1917) de Adolf Reinach”, O Que Nos Faz Pensar, vol. 26, no. 40, pp. 353–380.
5. Koltsov, A.V. (2020), “ ‘Religioznoe perezhivanie’ kak predmet filosofii religii v proekte A. Rainakha” [“Religious Experience” as a subject of philosophy of religion in A. Reinach’s Project], Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya 1: Bogoslovie. Filosofiya. Religiovedenie, vol. 88, pp. 60–79.
6. Konacheva, S.A. (2019), Bog posle Boga. Puti postmetafizicheskogo myshleniya [God after God. Trends in Postmetaphysical Thinking], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
7. Luhrmann, T.M. (2020), How God Becomes Real, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
8. Pylaev, M.A. (2017) Kategoriya «svyashchennoe» v fenomenologii religii, teologii i filosofii XX veka [Category of “the Holy” in phenomenology of religion, theology and philosophy of 20th century], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
9. Reinach, A. (1989), “Einleitung in die Philosophie”, in Schuhmann, K. (ed.), Sämtliche Werke: textkritische Ausgabe Ausgabe, in 2 Bänden, Philosophia-Verlag, München, Germany, pp. 369–513.
10. Schaeffler, R. (1989), Das Gebet und das Argument. Zwei Weisen des Sprechens von Gott. Eine Einführung in die Theorie der religiösen Sprache, Patmos, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Review
For citations:
Koltsov A.V. Issue of religious language and realistic phenomenology. Based on Reinach’s Göttingen lectures. Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion. 2021;(4):32-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2021-4-32-42