religiosaStudia Religiosa Rossica: научный журнал о религииStudia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion2658-4158РГГУ10.28995/2658-4158-2020-4-116-133religiosa-91Research ArticleVariaVariaВлияние игнатианской духовности на формирование концепции синтеза науки и религии Пьера Тейяра де ШарденаInfluence of Ignatyan spirituality on the formation of the Pierre Teillard de Chardin’s concept of synthesis of science and religionБазлевМ. М.BazlevM. M.

Михаил М. Базлев, аспирант

125993, Москва, Миусская пл., д. 6

 

Mikhail M. Bazlev, postgraduate student

bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125993

mike.bazlev@gmail.comРоссийский государственный гуманитарный университетРоссияRussian State University for the HumanitiesRussian Federation20201912202004116133Copyright © Базлев М.М., 20202020Базлев М.М.Bazlev M.M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://srr.rsuh.ru/jour/article/view/91

В работе проведен анализ факторов, часто ускользающих из поля зрения отечественных исследователей, однако, оказавших существенное влияние на формирование представления о возможности синтеза науки и религии в трудах католического теолога Пьера Тейяра де Шардена (1881–1955). Свидетельства о значимости этих факторов можно обнаружить в его эссе, личных заметках и письмах. Во-первых, творчество Шардена следует рассматривать в свете характерной для игнатианской духовности установки, ориентирующей послушника на поиск нового знания. Во-вторых, идею синтеза науки и религии в его творчестве можно адекватно оценить, приняв во внимание позицию католической церкви, боровшейся с модернистскими учениями эпохи. В-третьих, необходимо учитывать значение и роль "Духовных упражнений" Игнатия Лойолы, повлиявших на мистический опыт католического теолога. Перечисленные факторы оказали значительное влияние на теологию Шардена, которая стала одним из значимых примеров диалога науки и религии в XX столетии.

The study provides an analysis of some factors that are often overlooked by Russian researchers, which however had significant influence on the evolution of the concept of synthesizing science and religion in the works of Catholic theologian Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. Evidence of the significance of such factors can be found in his essays, personal notes and letters. First of all, the Chardin’s writings should be considered in the light of Ignatian spirituality, which guided the novice to search for new knowledge. Secondly, the idea of synthesizing scientific and religious insights in his writings can be adequately evaluated by taking into consideration the position of the Catholic church that was fighting against modernist theories of those times. Thirdly, the significance and the role of Spiritual Exercises by Ignatius of Loyola that influenced the mystic experience of the Catholic theologist should be taken into account. The above factors had considerable impact on Chardin’s theology, which has become one of the essential examples of the 20th century dialogue between science and religion.

Пьер Тейяр де ШарденИгнатий ЛойоласинтезмодернизммистицизмДуховные упражненияPierre Teilhard de ChardinIgnatius of LoyolasynthesismodernismmysticismSpiritual ExercisesReferencesГутнер 2010 – Гутнер Г.Б. Тейяр де Шарден // Новая философская энциклопедия. Т. 4. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: Мысль, 2010. С. 23–24.Ariew, R. (2003), “Descartes and the Jesuits: Doubt, Novelty, and the Eucharist”, in Feingold, M. (ed.), Jesuit science and the Republic of letters, MIT Press, Cambridge.Мень 1992 – Мень А. Пьер Тейяр де Шарден: христианин и ученый // Тейяр де Шарден П. Божественная среда. М.: Ренессанс; ИВО-СиД. 1992. C. V–XXIV.Baldini, U. (1985), “Una fonte poco utilizzata per la storia intellettuale: le ‘censurae librorum’ et ‘opinionum’ nell’antica Compagnia di Gesù”, Annali dell’Istituto di storico italo-germanico in Trento, vol. 11, pp. 19–67.Храмов 2018 – Храмов А. Притяжение противоположностей: рецепция теории эволюции в младоземельном креационизме // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2018. Вып. 76. С. 59–76.Barjon, L. and Leroy, P. (1964), La carrière scientifique de Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Editions du Rocher, Monaco.Храмов 2015 – Храмов А. Теистическая эволюция и дарвинизм: от войны к миру // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2015. № 4 (33). C. 84–109.De Solages, B. (1967), “Teilhard, Journal, Cahier 7, 9 June 1919”, in Teilhard de Chardin. Témoignage et étude sur le développement de sa pensée, Privât, Toulouse.Ariew 2003 – Ariew R. Descartes and the Jesuits. Doubt, novelty, and the Eucharist // Jesuit science and the Republic of letters / Ed. by M. Feingold. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2003. P. 157–194.D’Ouince, R. (1970), Un prophète en procès: Teilhard de Chardin, vol. 1, Aubier, Paris.Baldini 1985 – Baldini U. Una fonte poco utilizzata per la storia intellettuale: le ‘censurae librorum’ et ‘opinionum’ nell’antica Compagnia di Gesù // Annali dell’Istituto di storico italo-germanico in Trento. 1985. Vol. XI. P. 19–67.Dodson, E.O. (1984), The Phenomenon of Man Revisited: A Biological Viewpoint on Teilhard de Chardin, Columbia University Press, New York.Barjon, Leroy 1964 – Barjon L., Leroy P. La carrière scientifique de Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. Monaco: Editions du Rocher. 1964. 140 p.Feingold, M. (2003), Jesuit Science and the Republic of Letters, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.De Solages 1967 – De Solages B. Teilhard, Journal, Cahier 7, 9 June 1919 // Teilhard de Chardin. Témoignage et étude sur le développement de sa pensée. Toulouse: Privât. 1967. 397 p.Feldhay, R. (1987), “Knowledge and Salvation in Jesuit Culture”, Science in Context, vol. 1(2), pp. 195–213.D’Ouince 1970 – D’Ouince R. Un prophète en procès: Teilhard de Chardin. Vol. 1. Paris: Aubier, 1970. 277 p.Fischer, K.A.F. (1978), “Jesuiten-Mathematiker in der deutschen Assistenz bis 1773”, Archivum Historicum Societatis Iesu, vol. 47, pp. 159–224.Dodson 1984 – Dodson E.O. The Phenomenon of Man Revisited. A Biological Viewpoint on Teilhard de Chardin. New York: Columbia University Press. 1984. 281 p.Fischer, K.A.F. (1980), “Jesuiten in Breslau: Quellen zur Geschichte der Breslauer Jesuiten akademie und Jesuiten universitat, 1640–1755”, Archiv fur Schlesische Kirchengeschichte, vol. 38, pp. 121–174.Feingold 2003 – Feingold M. Jesuit Science and the Republic of Letters. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 2003. XI, 483 p.Fischer, K.A.F. (1983), “Jesuiten-Mathematiker in der Franzosischen und Italienischen Assistenz bis 1762 bzw. 1773”, Archivum Historicum Societatis Iesu, vol. 52, pp. 52–92.Feldhay 1987 – Feldhay R. Knowledge and Salvation in Jesuit Culture // Science in Context. 1987. Vol. 1(2). P. 195–213.Fischer, K.A.F. (1983), “Die Astronomie und Naturwissenschaften in Mahren”, Bohemia, vol. 24(l), pp. 19–103.Fischer 1978 – Fischer K.A.F. Jesuiten-Mathematiker in der deutschen Assistenz bis 1773 // Archivum Historicum Societatis Iesu. 1978. Vol. 47. P. 159–224.Fischer, K.A.F. and Hibst, P. (1983), “Die Astronomie an den Hochschulen in Brunn”, Bohemia, vol. 24(2), pp. 295–298.Fischer 1980 – Fischer K.A.F. Jesuiten in Breslau: Quellen zur Geschichte der Breslauer Jesuiten akademie und Jesuiten universitat, 1640–1755 // Archiv fur Schlesische Kirchengeschichte. 1980. Vol. 38. P. 121–174.Fleming, D. (2004), Like the Lightning: The Dynamics of the Ignatian Exercises, Institute of Jesuit Sources, St. Louis.Fischer 1983a – Fischer K.A.F. Jesuiten-Mathematiker in der Franzosischen und Italienischen Assistenz bis 1762 bzw. 1773 // Archivum Historicum Societatis Iesu. 1983. Vol. 52. P. 52–92.Flynn, G. and Murray, P.D. (2011), Ressourcement. A Movement for Renewal in Twentieth-Century Catholic Theology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Fischer 1983b – Fischer K.A.F. Die Astronomie und Naturwissenschaften in Mahren // Bohemia. 1983. Vol. 24(l). P. 19–103.Galleni, L. (1992), “Relationships between scientific analysis and the world view of Pierre Tellhard de Chardin”, Zygon, vol. 27(2), pp. 153–166.Fischer, Hibst 1983 – Fischer K.A.F., Hibst P. Die Astronomie an den Hochschulen in Brunn // Bohemia. 1983. Vol. 24(2). P. 295–298.Galleni, L. (2011), “Teilhard de Chardin’s multicentric model in Science and Theology: A Proposal for the Third Millennium”, in Salmon, J. and Farina, J. (eds.) The Legacy of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Paulist Press, New York, pp. 59–78.Fleming 2004 – Fleming D. Like the Lightning: The Dynamics of the Ignatian Exercises. St. Louis: Institute of Jesuit Sources. 2004. 191 p.Galleni, L. and Scalfari, F. (2006), “Teilhard de Chardin engagement with the relationships between Science and Theology in light of discussion about Environmental Ethics”, in Drummond, C.D. (ed.) Teilhard de Chardin on people and planet, Equinox, London, pp. 160–178.Flynn 2011 – Flynn G., Murray P.D. Ressourcement. A Movement for Renewal in Twentieth-Century Catholic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. 604 p.Grumett, D. (2006), Christ in the World of Matter: Teilhard de Chardin’s Religious Experience and Vision, Religious Experience Research Centre, Lampeter.Galleni 1992 – Galleni L. Relationships between scientific analysis and the world view of Pierre Tellhard de Chardin // Zygon. 1992. Vol. 27(2). P. 153–166.Gutner, G.B. (2010), “Teilhard de Chardin”, in Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. T. 4 [New philosophical encyclopedia, vol. 4], Mysl’, Moscow, Russia, pp. 23–24.Galleni, Scalfari 2006 – Galleni L., Scalfari F. Teilhard de Chardin engagement with the relationships between Science and Theology in light of discussion about Environmental Ethics // Teilhard de Chardin on people and planet / Ed. by C.D. Drummond. London: Equinox. 2006. P. 160–178.Harris, S.J. (1989), “Transposing the Merton Thesis: Apostolic Spirituality and the Establishment of the Jesuit Scientific Tradition”, Science in Context, vol. 3, pp. 29–65.Galleni 2011 – Galleni L. Teilhard de Chardin’s multicentric model in Science and Theology. A Proposal for the Third Millennium // The Legacy of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin / Ed. by J. Salmon, J. Farina. New York: Paulist Press, 2011. P. 59–78.Hill, B.R. (2001), “Teilhard’s Vision and the Environment”, Horizons, vol. 28(01), pp. 50–68.Grumett 2006 – Grumett D. Christ in the World of Matter. Teilhard de Chardin’s Religious Experience and Vision. Lampeter: Religious Experience Research Centre, 2006. 19 p.Hofmann, J.R. (2020), “Erich Wasmann, S.J.: Natural Species and Catholic Polyphyletic Evolution during the Modernist Crisis”, Journal of Jesuit Studies, vol. 7, pp. 244–262.Harris 1989 – Harris S.J. Transposing the Merton Thesis. Apostolic Spirituality and the Establishment of the Jesuit Scientific Tradition // Science in Context. 1989. Vol. 3. P. 29–65.Khramov, A. (2015), “Theistic Evolution and Darwinism: from War to Peace”, Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, vol. 4(33), pp. 84–109.Hill 2001 – Hill B.R. Teilhard’s Vision and the Environment // Horizons. 2001. Vol. 28(01). P. 50–68.Khramov, A. (2018), “Attraction of the opposites. Reception of the Theory of Evolution in the Young Earth creationism”, Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiya. Religiovedenie, vol. 76, pp. 59–76.Hofmann 2020 – Hofmann J.R. Erich Wasmann, S.J.: Natural Species and Catholic Polyphyletic Evolution during the Modernist Crisis // Journal of Jesuit Studies. 2020. Vol. 7. P. 244–262.Laberge, J. (1973), Pierre Teilhard de Chardin et Ignace de Loyola: Les notes de retraite, Editions Bellarmin, Montreal.Laberge 1973 – Laberge J. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin et Ignace de Loyola. Les notes de retraite. Montreal: Editions Bellarmin, 1973. 237 p.Malachi, M. (1988), The Jesuits: the Society of Jesus and the Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church, Simon & Schuster, New York, London.Malachi 1988 – Malachi M. The Jesuits: the Society of Jesus and the Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church. New York; London: Simon & Schuster, 1988. 525 p.Men’, A. (1992), “Pierre Teilhard de Chardin: a Christian and a scientist”, in Teilhard de Chardin P. Bozhestvennaya sreda [The Divine Milieu], Renessans, IVO-SiD, Moscow, Russia, pp. V–XXIV.Piveteau 1964 – Piveteau J. Le Pere Teilhard de Chardin savant. Paris: Fayard, 1964. 143 p.Piveteau, J. (1964), Le Pere Teilhard de Chardin savant, Fayard, Paris.Russell 1998 – Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action / Ed by. R.J. Russell, W.R. Stoeger, F.J. Ayala. California: Vatican Observatory and the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences. 1998, 551 p.Russell, R.J., Stoeger, W.R., and Ayala, F.J. (eds.) (1998), Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, Vatican Observatory and the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, California.Savary 2010 – Savary L.M. The New Spiritual Exercises in the Spirit of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press, 2010. 197 p.Savary, L.M. (2010), The New Spiritual Exercises in the Spirit of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Paulist Press, Mahwah, New Jersey.Speaight 1967 – Speaight R. The life of Teilhard de Chardin. New York: Harper & Row, 1967. 360 p.Speaight, R. (1967), The life of Teilhard de Chardin. Harper & Row, New York.Udias 2008 – Udias A. Teilhard de Chardin and the current dialogue between Science and Religion // God seen by Science: Anthropic evolution of the Universe. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia Comillas, 2008. P. 71–97.Udias, A. (2008), “Teilhard de Chardin and the current dialogue between Science and Religion”, in God seen by Science: Anthropic evolution of the Universe, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, pp. 71–97.Wildiers 1968 – Wildiers N.M. An introduction to Teilhard de Chardin. New York: Harper & Row, 1968. P. 180–181.Wildiers, N.M. (1968), An introduction to Teilhard de Chardin. Harper & Row, New York.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.