<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">religiosa</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Studia Religiosa Rossica: научный журнал о религии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2658-4158</issn><publisher><publisher-name>РГГУ</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.28995/2658-4158-2020-4-69-81</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">religiosa-88</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Papers</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Антропологические учения русских теософов начала XX в.</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Anthropological doctrines of the Russian theosophists of the early 20th century</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шевчук</surname><given-names>А. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shevchuk</surname><given-names>A. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Артем И. Шевчук, бакалавр религиоведения</p><p>125993, Москва, Миусская пл., 6.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Artem I. Shevchuk, bachelor of religious studies</p><p>bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125993</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">kaunvuvern@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Российский государственный гуманитарный университет<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Russian State University for the Humanities<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>69</fpage><lpage>81</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Шевчук А.И., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Шевчук А.И.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Shevchuk A.I.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://srr.rsuh.ru/jour/article/view/88">https://srr.rsuh.ru/jour/article/view/88</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье предложена типология русских теософских антропологических учений начала XX в., а также проанализированы причины разногласий теософов по антропологическим вопросам. Христианские теософы, критично относившиеся к «ориентальным» элементам теософских учений, предпочитали ориентироваться на христианскую традицию, синтезируя ее с отдельными теософскими концепциями. Русские теософы, ориентировавшиеся на традиционное теософское учение, отстаивали идею универсального характера религиозной антропологии и часто предпочитали «ориентальный» подход к антропологии. Тем не менее они принимали во внимание христианство и стремились отождествить «ориентальную» и христианскую антропологию. Для теософов были характерны миллениальные ожидания – они считали, что вскоре наступит новая эра, которая приведет к изменению человеческой природы. Многие из них считали, что природу человека можно преобразовать благодаря духовным практикам. Подобно многим другим представителям эзотеризма той эпохи, теософы привлекали научные концепции для обоснования своих антропологических взглядов и обращались к свидетельствам экспериментов, которые позволяли обнаружить «невидимое». При всем различии, теософские подходы к антропологии обладали общими характеристиками и отражали характерные для эпохи тенденции.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article suggests a typology of Russian theosophical anthropological theories of the early 20th century and offers an analysis of the root causes of disputes between theosophists on anthropological matters. Christian theosophists, who were critical about the Orientalist elements of theosophical doctrines, preferred to draw upon the Christian tradition, while synthesizing it with certain theosophical concepts. Russian theosophists, leaning towards the traditional theosophical doctrine, espoused the idea of universal nature of religious anthropology and often preferred the Oriental approach to anthropology. Nevertheless, they had regard to the Christianity and sought to homologate Oriental anthropology with the Christian one. Millennial expectations were common with the theosophists; they believed that a new era was approaching that would result in a change of the human nature. Many of them reckoned that the human nature could be transformed through spiritual practices. Like many other advocates of Esotericism of those times, theosophists engaged scientific concepts to justify their anthropological views and referred to experimental evidences that would allow revealing the Invisible. For all of their differences, theosophical approaches to anthropology had some shared features and reflected the trends that were common in that age.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>религиозная антропология</kwd><kwd>история религии</kwd><kwd>теософия</kwd><kwd>оккультизм</kwd><kwd>православие</kwd><kwd>христианство</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>religious anthropology</kwd><kwd>history of religion</kwd><kwd>theosophy</kwd><kwd>occultism</kwd><kwd>Orthodoxy</kwd><kwd>Christianity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фаликов 2007 – Фаликов Б.З. Культы и культура: от Елены Блаватской до Рона Хаббарда. М.: РГГУ, 2007. 265 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carlson, M. (1993), No Religion higher than Truth: A History of the Theosophical movement in Russia, 1875–1922, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шевчук 2019 – Шевчук А.И. Феномен «христианской теософии» в России: (по материалам Смоленского теософского общества) // Религиоведческие исследования. 2019. № 2. С. 84–103.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chajes, J. (2019), Recycled Lives. A History of Reincarnation in Blavatsky’s Theosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carlson 1993 – Carlson M. No religion higher than truth. A History of the Theosophical movement in Russia, 1875–1922. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1993. 298 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Falikov, B. (2007), Cults and Culture: From Helenа Blavatsky to Ron Hubbard, RSUH, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chajes 2019 – Chajes J. Recycled Lives. A History of Reincarnation in Blavatsky’s Theosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. 215 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hanegraaf, W. (2012), Esotericism and the Academy. Rejected knowledge in Western Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hanegraaf 2012 – Hanegraaf W.J. Esotericism and the Academy. Rejected knowledge in Western Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 478 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shevchuk, A.I. (2019), “The phenomenon of ‘Christian Theosophy’ in Russia (the case of the Smolensk Theosophical Society)”, Researches in Religious studies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 84–103.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
