religiosaStudia Religiosa Rossica: научный журнал о религииStudia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion2658-4158РГГУ10.28995/2658-4158-2020-4-18-39religiosa-85Research ArticleСтатьиPapersНовая религиозная антропология и трансформация науки во второй половине XIX столетияNew religious anthropology and transformation of science in the second half of the 19th centuryРаздъяконовВ. С.RazdyakonovV. S.

Владислав С. Раздъяконов, кандидат исторических наук

125993, Москва, Миусская пл., д. 6

Vladislav S. Razdyakonov, Cand. of Sci. (History)

bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125993

razdyakonov.vladislav@gmail.comРоссийский государственный гуманитарный университетРоссияRussian State University for the HumanitiesRussian Federation202019122020041839Copyright © Раздъяконов В.С., 20202020Раздъяконов В.С.Razdyakonov V.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://srr.rsuh.ru/jour/article/view/85

Новая религиозная антропология определяется как совокупность учений и практик, постулировавших существование особого, отличного от признанного во второй половине XIX в. соответствующим научному, устройства человека, а также возможности обретения человеком сверхспособностей. В фокусе внимания статьи – влияние научных концептов и идей на содержание учений новой религиозной антропологии. Показано, что ключевую роль в становлении новой религиозной антропологии сыграли процессы, определявшие развитие науки – институционализации, специализации и медиатизации научного знания. В статье предложена эвристическая типология новой религиозной антропологии – «христианская», «научная», «ориенталистская» и «оккультная». Новая религиозная антропология рассматривается как средство преодоления характерного для дискурса второй половины XIX в. представления о конфликте между наукой и религией.

New religious anthropology is defined as an aggregate of doctrines and practices that postulated the existence of a particular arrangement of the human being, distinctive from what was recognized as consistent with the scientific approach of the latter half of the 19th century, as well as the human capacity to acquire superhuman powers. The article is focused on the impact of scientific concepts and ideas on the doctrines of new religious anthropology. It reveals that the key role in the formation of new religious anthropology was played by the processes that determined the development of science, such as institutionalization, specialization and mediatization of scientific knowledge. The article suggests a heuristic typology of new religious anthropology, distinguishing Christian, Scientific, Orientalist and Occult types. New religious anthropology is viewed as a means of overcoming the conflict between the science and the religion that was typical for the discourse of the latter half of the 19th century.

религиозная антропологияистория наукиоккультизмэзотеризмнаука и религияreligious anthropologyhistory of scienceoccultismesotericismscience and religionReferencesВизгин 2013 – Визгин В.П. Герметическая традиция и научная революция: к новой интерпретации тезиса Ф. Йейтс // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2013. № 1. С. 92–100.Bowler, P. (2003), Evolution. The history of an Idea, University of California Press, Berkley and Los Angeles.Кузнецова 2009 – Кузнецова Н.И. Презентизм и антикваризм – две картины прошлого // Мировое древо. 2009. № 15. С. 164–196.Daniel, D. (2006) “Invisible Wombs: Rethinking Paracelsus’s Concept of Body and Matter”, Ambix, vol. 53, no. 2. pp. 129–142.Панин 2015 – Панин С. Философия Канта и идея обновления науки в эзотерической литературе второй половины XIX – начала XX века // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. М.: РАНХиГС, 2015. С. 135–151.Ellenberger, H. (2018), Otkritije Bessoznatelnogo. Istoria I evolutsia dinamicheskoj psyhiatrii [The Discovery of the Unconscious. The History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry], Akademicheskij Proekt, Moscow, Russia.Раздъяконов 2017 – Раздъяконов В.С. Физиологи против Теологии: «наука» как источник секуляризации в идеологии научного материализма XIX столетия // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия 1. Богословие, философия, религиоведение. М.: ПСТГУ, 2017. № 6 (74). С. 27–43.Eliade, M. (2013), Yoga: Bessmertie I svoboda; Patandjali I yoga [Yoga: Immortality and freedom; Patanjali and Yoga], Ladomir, Moscow, Russia.Раздъяконов 2020 – Раздъяконов В.С. Понятие о «религии» в отечественном эзотеризме конца XIX – начала XX века: (по материалам Московского спиритического кружка) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2020. Вып. 89. С. 129–148.Galvan, J. (2017) “The Victorian Post-Human: Transmition, Information and the Séance”, in Kontou, T. and Wilburne, S. (eds.), Ashgate Research Companion to Nineteenth Century Spiritualism and the Occult, Ashgate, pp. 79–96.Терентьев 1999 – Терентьев Ф. История эфира. М.: ФАЗИС, 1999. 176 с.Gregory, F. (1977), Scientific materialism in nineteenth century Germany, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.Элленбергер 2018 – Элленбергер Г. Открытие бессознательного: История и эволюция динамической психиатрии. М.: Академический проект, 2018. Т. 1. 554 с.Hanegraaf, W. (2012), Esotericism and the Acedemy. Rejected knowledge in Western Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Элиаде 2013 – Элиаде М. Йога: Бессмертие и свобода; Патанджали и йога. М.: Ладомир, 2013. 560 с.Josephson-Storm, J.A. (2017), The Myth of Disenchantment. Magic, Modernity and the Birth of Human Sciences, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Ярошевский 1997 – Ярошевский М.Г. История психологии: От античности до середины XX века. М.: Издательский центр «Академия», 1997. 409 с.Kuznetzova, N.I. (2009), “Presentism and Antiquarism – Two Pictures of the Past”, Arbor Mundi, vol. 15, pp. 164–196.Bowler 2003 – Bowler P.J. Evolution. The history of an Idea. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2003. XIV, 412 p.Lightman, B. (2007), Victorian Popularizers of Science. Designing Nature for New Audiences, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Daniel 2006 – Daniel D. Invisible wombs: Rethinking Paracelsus’s concept of body and matter // ambix. 2006. Vol. 53. No. 2. P. 129–142.McIntosh, Ch. (2011), Eliphas Levi and the French Occult Revival, Suny Press.Galvan 2017 – Galvan J. The Victorian Post-Human: Transmition, Information and the Séance // The Ashgate Research Companion to Nineteenth Century Spiritualism and the Occult / Ed. by T. Kontou, S. Wilburne. Ashgate, 2012. P. 79–96.Panin, S. (2015), Kant’s philosophy and the idea of renovation of the science in esoteric literature in the second half of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century, Gosudarstvo, relgiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 135–151.Gregory 1977 – Gregory F. Scientific materialism in nineteenth century Germany. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1977. XVII, 279 p.Patridge, C. (2004), The Re-enchantment of the West. Alternative Spiritualities, Sacralization, Popular Culture, and Occulture, A Continuum Imprint, London; NewYork, vol. 1.Hanegraaf 2012 – Hanegraaf W. Esotericism and the Academy. Rejected knowledge in Western Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 478 p.Razdyakonov, V.S. (2017), “Physiologists against Theology: Science as a Source of Secularization in the ideology of Scientific Materialism in the 19th century”, St. Tikhon’s University Review, Series I: Theology, Philosophy, Religious Studies, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 27–43.Josephson-Storm 2017 – Josephson-Storm J.A. The Myth of Disenchantment. Magic, Modernity and the Birth of Human Sciences. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2017. 400 p.Razdyakonov, V.S. (2020), “The Idea of “Religion” in the Russian Esotericism of the late 19th – early 20th centuries. The case of Moscow spritualist circle, St. Tikhon’s University Review, Series I: Theology, Philosophy, Religious Studies, vol. 89, pp. 129–148.Lightman 2007 – Lightman B. Victorian Popularizers of Science. Designing Nature for New Audiences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007. XVI, 545 p.Sommer, A. (2009) “From Astronomy to transcendental Darwinism: Carl Du Prel (1839–1899)”, Journal of Scientific Exploration, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 59–68.McIntosh 2011 – McIntosh Ch. Eliphas Levi and the French Occult Revival. Suny Press, 2011. 240 p.Stocking, G. (1991), Victorian Anthropology. Free Press, New York.Partridge 2004 – Partridge C. The Re-enchantment of the West. Alternative Spiritualities, Sacralization, Popular Culture, and Occulture. London; New-York: A Continuum Imprint, 2004. Vol. 1. 265 p.Stuckrad, K. (2014), The Scientification of religion. A Historical Study of Discoursive Change, De Gruyter.Sommer 2009 – Sommer A. From Astronomy to transcendental Darwinism: Carl Du Prel (1839–1899) // Journal of Scientific Exploration. 2009. Vol 23. No. 1. P. 59–68.Terent’ev, F. (2009), Istoria efira [History of ether], FAZIS, Moscow, Russia.Stocking 1991 – Stocking G. Victorian Anthropology. New-York: Free Press, 1991. 429 p.Turner, F. (1993), Contesting Cultural authority: essays in Victorian intellectual life, Chicago University Press, Chacago.Stuckrad 2014 – Stuckrad K. The Scientification of religion. An Historical Study of Discoursive Change. De Gruyter, 2014. 225 p.Vizgin, V.P. (2013), “Hermetic tradition and scientific revolution. New interpretation of F. Yates’ thesis”, Gosudarstvo, relgiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 92–100.Turner 1993 – Turner F. Contesting Cultural authority: essays in Victorian intellectual life. Chacago: Chicago University Press, 1993. 368 p.Yaroschevskii, M.G. (1997), Istoria Psyhologii. Ot Antichnosti do seredini XX veka [History of psychology. From antiquity to the middle of the 20th сentury], Izdatelskii Tsentr «Akademia», Moscow, Russia.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.